<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do we need a better history of the hippy era?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.andreskabel.com/blog/2009/08/12/do-we-need-a-better-history-of-the-hippy-era/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.andreskabel.com/blog/2009/08/12/do-we-need-a-better-history-of-the-hippy-era/</link>
	<description>Hope Is a Book, The Future Is a Song</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 03:53:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Andres Kabel</title>
		<link>http://www.andreskabel.com/blog/2009/08/12/do-we-need-a-better-history-of-the-hippy-era/comment-page-1/#comment-1092</link>
		<dc:creator>Andres Kabel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 22:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andreskabel.com/blog/?p=1075#comment-1092</guid>
		<description>Damon, no, in fact I haven&#039;t read any Houellebecq, a real omission. Must do so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damon, no, in fact I haven&#8217;t read any Houellebecq, a real omission. Must do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damon Young</title>
		<link>http://www.andreskabel.com/blog/2009/08/12/do-we-need-a-better-history-of-the-hippy-era/comment-page-1/#comment-1091</link>
		<dc:creator>Damon Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 22:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andreskabel.com/blog/?p=1075#comment-1091</guid>
		<description>Andres, have you read Houellebecq&#039;s ATOMISED?

A vicious portrayal of &#039;sixties egotism and hedonism, which is perhaps unfair, but certainly provocative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andres, have you read Houellebecq&#8217;s ATOMISED?</p>
<p>A vicious portrayal of &#8216;sixties egotism and hedonism, which is perhaps unfair, but certainly provocative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

